It’s amazing what happens when people are left alone to make their own decisions and come to their own conclusions about certain things. The natural way that people come to develop their opinions on things is the way that real tolerance is reached. The leftist SJWs just don’t seem to understand this concept. They believe that shouting at people over and over again while calling them racists or homophobes or whatever the insult may be, will drive them to accept their point of view on any certain issue. This hurts their cause more than it helps it. For example: Say you’re a person who isn’t completely on-board with the whole idea of gay marriage, but you personally don’t have any problems with gay people and accept that this is now the law of the land. How do you think you’d feel if anytime you expressed your opinion about how you feel about the issue someone shouted “Homophobe!” at you over and over? You probably would start to resent that issue even more. That kind of behavior would probably drive you to be more against it than you already were. The reason? It’s because you’d get into this frame of mind: Why are you going to try to be tolerant of an issue you aren’t completely on-board with if everyone is just going to scream at you and call you a homophobe anyway? In this situation, if everyone just left you alone and let you believe what you wanted to, you may come around one day! Who knows? If not, than that’s alright too because this is America and everyone in entitled to their opinion.
Real tolerance can not be achieved by forcing beliefs upon someone. Even if people will say they’re tolerant just to not get screamed at, that doesn’t mean it’s what they actually believe. This is how the fake tolerance of the leftists is created. It’s born out of fear of being called a racist bigot sexist homophobe and doesn’t do anything for anyone. If you just leave people alone to make their own decisions and believe what they want to, some of them will come around one day. In contrast, if you yell at and berate people for having different beliefs, you’ll just cause them to hold even more resentment than they already had. If you SJWs really want to help your causes, then leave people alone, don’t cause resentment, and let people achieve real tolerance on their own.
Last week the cancelation of the popular ABC comedy “Last Man Standing” was announced despite having very solid ratings. The show stars Tim Allen (a Republican) as Mike Baxter. Baxter is a middle aged, middle class, conservative white man living in the Denver suburbs. He lives in a house with 4 women and frequently makes jokes related to this. He also frequently jokes about his son-in-law and oldest daughter who are model SJWs. Politics is a sub plot of the show, making satire of how a family with so many different views operates, and at the end of each episode the members of the family are always able to put their views aside to come together.
So a well received show that’s been on the air since 2011 suddenly gets canceled despite it’s success? Fans of the show weren’t buying it and neither was Allen. He believes the show was canceled due to his personal beliefs which he recently discussed on “Jimmy Kimmel Live.” There are talks of the show picking up a new home on another network but this is beside the point. The point is that the media has gotten completely out of control. Their attempts to control the narrative is pushing its way into everything they can control, now including the shows they air on their networks. Anything that doesn’t fit the SJW leftist narrative is now seemingly off limits. There is a petition on change.org to reinstate the show which currently has over 100,000 signatures. Think about giving your signature to fight back against this authoritarian narrative of the media.
Recently, Blaire White did a response video to Riley Dennis, (a popular YouTube transgender activist). Dennis made a video explaining LGBT people’s decision to defend muslims on the basis that not all muslims support Sharia Law in regards to LGBT people. Well, duh! Of course not all muslims want to stone LGBT people to death; however, the Sharia Law that many islamic countries follow does call for the oppression, imprisonment, and even death of LGBT people. Dennis acknowledges this, but then attempts to create a false equivalency with Christianity and again uses the excuse that not all muslims abide by Sharia Law. This point she makes over and over again is irrelevant because we aren’t talking about muslims, we’re talking about Islam! One is a group of people and the other is a set of ideas. There’s a difference, the set of ideas is what we critique. The fact that the LGBT community constantly defends Islam and will make excuses for its completely backwards view on LGBT people is mind-boggling. Blaire White does a great job explaining the absolute insanity of this alliance and dissecting Dennis’ video.
Fascist– a person who is very intolerant or domineering in a particular area.
This is the definition of a fascist given by the easiest Google search. If it’s that easy to find the definition for this term, then why are these “anti-fascists” so confused and so ill-informed about their own political stance? Ignorance is the answer and it’s the only logical explanation.
They go to a speaking event at a university, they call the speaker a fascist, then they proceed to burn things, destroy property and prevent that person from speaking. Hmmm… seems like exhibiting behaviors of a fascist don’t you think? Well, let’s return to the definition and look again. “Person who is very intolerant.” Intolerant of Milo’s views, check! “Domineering in a particular area.” In universities all across the US, check! Ladies and gentlemen, we have anti-fascist who are actually fascists!
This pitiful display at UC Berkeley was political violence at its finest. During the rioting that took place, the rioters physically assaulted both men and woman attendees of Milo’s event, pepper sprayed people, and beat a man unconscious and dragged him through the street. The people who claim to be for tolerance and peace turn into free speech suppressing fascists whenever someone they don’t like attempts to speak. This is absolutely unacceptable and it’s promoted by the mainstream leftist agenda. When you have professors indoctrinating the students with safe spaces and trigger warnings along with B-list celebrities like Sarah Silverman calling for a military coup to overthrow the government and calling this despicable behavior “The Resistance” what do you expect?
Any sane person knows this is madness, and it’s only going to get worse. If we are going to have any hope of stopping political violence and fascistic behavior, we must continue to fight for free speech every single day! If it’s one thing these people hate and fear the most it’s free speech. Use it to fight these people, because we don’t need to use violence and savagery. Unlike them, we respect and use our most treasured and sacred right guaranteed to us by the first amendment.
They will not prevent us from speaking and they will not intimidate us.
By now, most politically active people have seen the debate between Tomi Lahren and Trevor Noah on The Daily Show that took place last week. It was not a great debate. Rather than bring any facts or figures to the table to counter Lahren’s, Noah would usually make a snappy comical remark to gain the momentum back from the audience. This is understandable considering he is a comedian… On a side note, this really begs the question of “why did a comedian debate a political analyst/commentator?” However, when you think about it; The Daily Show is noting more than a Regressive platform for Leftists to come and confirm their biases through a comedian host. That being said, there are many legitimate reasons for pondering why this debate even happened; but let’s move on to the good stuff!
Many of you probably overlooked the most “outrageously racist” thing Tomi Lahren dared to say during the debate: “I don’t see color” (6:25 in the interview video). Tomi you insensitive bigot! Don’t you know this is a microaggression!?
Microaggression- is a term coined by psychiatrist and Harvard University professor Chester M. Pierce in 1970 to describe insults and dismissals he regularly witnessed non-black Americans inflict on African Americans. (Definition courtesy of Wikipedia)
Ah yes, the social justice warrior beloved microaggression. By the definition it may sound as though they are actually insults, but in reality microaggressions are just normal everyday things people say that SJWs love to use to reveal your “hidden implicit racism.” Apparently when Lahren said that she didn’t see color (or as it’s known in the microaggression world, “colorblindness”) she was really contributing to racism, not trying to dismiss it. In the video, after she says this you can clearly hear the crowd erupt in disbelief and outrage. How dare she say that she judges people on the individual and not their race! How dare she say that the color of someone’s skin doesn’t make a difference to her! How incredibly bigoted and racist!
Remember a time as children when we were taught not look at the color of someone’s skin and treat them differently because of it? Remember when it was a good thing to be “colorblind?” Chances are, most of you do. However, the mainstream media and the Regressive movement are so utterly obsessed with race that it has become the only thing they want to talk about. Race has once again become the new norm for judging people, and it’s disgusting. Many of us remember a time when this was called racism.
This small 4 word sentence from The Daily Show is a prime example of how this microaggression garbage is starting to make it’s way into mainstream society. It may be restricted to the universities and Hollywood at the moment, but given time and no opposition it will make it’s way into your daily lives as well very soon. We have to start to call this crap out where we see it and once again fight for the judgement of the individual and not the color of his or her skin.